Update on Cindy Crawford in All Natural Photos

• Was Cindy Crawford's Unretouched Lingerie Photo 'Stolen' and 'Maliciously Altered'?  People Magazine2 hours ago

• Cindy Crawford's flaws were faked in viral lingerie photo: report

• The "unretouched" Cindy Crawford photo is fake

  

Cindy Crawford lingerie image stirs debate over what...

The word just coming out from the actual photographer of those lingerie images:

Unflattering Cindy Crawford image that showed the supermodel in her lingerie is a 'fraudulent altered version'

That is the claim anyhow... who or what to believe?? 

A leaked photo of supermodel Cindy Crawford that was claimed to be 'untouched' by Photoshop is a fake, claims the photographer.

Celebrity snapper John Russo said in a statement to ABC News that the image - from a 2013 cover shoot with Marie Claire Mexico - was 'stolen or unlawfully accessed and then altered and distributed to the media.'

The image surfaced online last month and quickly went viral, showing Crawford, 49, displaying wrinkles and sagging skin around her stomach area. 

   

But what does all this mean for us ladies and our "body image" our self esteem??  Is this a fake distorted, confused culture that we are stuck in?!  

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2976071/Cindy-Crawford-image-showed-supermodel-lingerie-fraudulent-altered-version-claims-celebrity-photographer.html#ixzz3THhYvge5

Cindy Crawford supermodel in the news for being "Al Naturel"

So far there is a sexy sensual page started Check it out~! 

Much more explicit imagery is going to be released as 

a secret link for my special viewers!! stay tuned!! 

Cindy Crawford al natural

Source: CNN  Added on 8:14 AM ET, Mon February 16, 2015

Unaltered photo of supermodel Cindy Crawford circulates online -

"An apparent image of 48-year-old Cindy Crawford in lingerie is stirring discussion about what “real” women look like — but not for reasons you might expect. The practice of photo retouching in fashion publications renders most models completely free of blemishes or imperfections to the point of being unrealistic. But this photo of Crawford baring her sun-kissed torso is drawing praise for showing her in a realistic light.
The image of murky origins spread through social media on Friday after British ITV News anchor Charlene White shared it on Twitter, attributing it to Marie Claire magazine. The American version of Marie Claire, a joint venture between Hearst Magazines and French-based Marie Claire Album, called the image real, honest and gorgeous, but denied any connection to the photo."

This is exactly the philosophical debate which is the subject of our site here.   What is natural and what is not?  How far should advertising and the media go into the fantasy realm of photoshop heaven?  Or should there be a reasonable limit so that we as a human society will come to understand and respect the true reality of our Beauty.  Not our fake, photoshopped, android-apocalypse version of unrealistic women in the fashion industry!

What do you think about it?  Do you like NATURAL in the BEAUTY you are appreciating?